More specifically, this mixedmethods study investigates how learners apply genetics content knowledge as they justify claims relative to genetic en gineering. Among other factors that could affect students argumentation skills, the duration of their engagement in appropriate teaching environments or teaching interventions have been studied, yielding opposing results. Investigating the impact of the duration of engagement in. This paper makes the case for argument in science education drawing on a range of research efforts in the field. For this purpose, data were collected from 33 lessons by video.
The work cited is a component of the project titled enhancing the quality of argument in school science conducted between 19992002 and supported by the. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of argumentation model on students achievement on the unit of states of matter and heat, and also to determine how to change students argumentation skills during the instruction through argumentation model. Development and implementation of the sciencetechnology. Recent research shows, however, that opportunities for students to engage in collaborative discourse and argumentation offer a means of enhancing student conceptual understanding and students skills and capabilities with scientific reasoning. In phase 1, working with a group of 12 science teachers, the main emphasis was to develop sets of materials and strategies to support argumentation in the classroom, and to support and assess teachers development with teaching argumentation. Pdf the research reported in this study focuses on the design and evaluation of learning environments that support the teaching and learning. The sample teaching materials for secondary school are being designed to illustrate aspects of the nature of knowledge and the processes of explanation, as these are reflected in science especially but not exclusively. This study explores how individuals make use of scientific content knowledge for socioscientific argumentation. Argumentation skills profile on 8th grade students using. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science shirley simon sibel erduran jonathan osborne kings college london institute of education, london paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, april 710, 2002 new orleans, usa address for correspondence. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science by jonathan osborne, shirley simon and s erduran download pdf 556 kb. Using a framework for evaluating the nature of the discourse and its quality developed from toulmins argument pattern, the findings show that there was improvement in the quality of students argumentation. The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the. The purpose of this research is to find out the profile of students argumentation skills and find out how to measure the quality of argumentation.
International journal of research in education and science. Argumentation is considered by science teachers as a major component of science education. Enhancing and evaluating scientific argumentation in the inquiryoriented college chemistry classroom by annabel n. An argumentationbased teachinglearning strategy was used to enhance quality in students arguments in science lessons. This paper reports on a teacher professional development pd programme addressing dialogic argumentation in mathematics and science classrooms. The paper analyses design frameworks, their contexts and lesson plans, to evaluate their potential for enhancing reasoning through foregrounding the. Socioscientific argumentation as a driver for science. The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the 21 st century. The purpose of the study was to reveal the effects of scientific argumentationoriented teaching activities on the environmental attitudes and knowledge of seventhgrade turkish students within the human and environment unit compared to the activities suggested by the ministry of education science and technology curriculum. Students responses toward scientific argumentation with adi. In particular, argumentation is a complex and challenging skill to teach. The purpose of this study was to investigate middle school students processes of argumentation in science lessons and to compare students argumentation in different contexts socioscientific contextscientific context.
Enhancing dialogic argumentation in mathematics and science. The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. Nature of science lessons, argumentation and scientific discussions among students in science classes a case study in a successful school elif ozturk1, sukran ucus2 1giresun university, 2ahievran university abstract argumentation is highlighted as one of the most important activities of science education by many researchers. Enhancing the quality of argument in school science article pdf available in argumentation 52301 january 2001 with 257 reads how we measure reads. Interviews are conducted with 45 participants, representing three distinct groups. While argumentation skills are becoming more and more important in an increasingly polarised society, the social aspect of argumentation is often neglected in secondary education. Journal of research in science education, 4110, 9941020 simon, s.
The research on the development of argumentation in school science involved a. Simon s and erduran s osborne 2002 enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association for research in. Pearson osborne j, erduran s and simon s 2004 enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science j. Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction. Teachers understanding of argument and their assessment. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science core. To support instruction and learning about argumentation, the cbal project creates. The responses towards scientific argumentation adi learning model to physics. Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners the state of science education for adolescents is at an important crossroads. The challenges of teaching and learning about science in. The scientific argumentation profile of physics teacher. Level of scientific argumentation skill depends on the quality of the rebuttal process. Apr 23, 2010 argument and debate are common in science, yet they are virtually absent from science education.
Analysis of argumentation in middle school science classroom using argumentbased inquiry, journal of the korean chemical society, 59, 1, 78. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science osborne. Research in science teaching, science education, international journal of science education. Abstract the research reported in this study focuses on the design and evaluation of learning environments that support the teaching and. The aim of this study is to explore indonesian students responses towards scientific argumentation with adi learning model to physics literacy by using survey study. The role of argument in science education springerlink. Assessing preservice science teachers understanding of. A comparative metaanalysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Enhancing the quality of students argumentation and. Enhancing high school studentss rebuttals as an important.
In addition to these projects, a body of relatively unintegrated research concerning argumentative discourse in science education has begun to. International journal of research in education and science user. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of thought experimentsbased argumentation learning approach on the development of critical thinking skills of 12 thgrade high school students in organic chemistry teaching. Jonathan osborne, sibel erduran, shirley simon and. Abstract this paper reports some methodological approaches to the analysis of argumentation discourse developed as part of the twoandahalf year project titled enhancing the quality of argument in school scienc supported by the economic and social research council in the united kingdom. He reported that most teachers ignore data in their scientific explanations. Using toulmins argument pattern in the evaluation of. Our specific intention was to determine whether secondary science teachers in england give pupils opportunities to develop and rehearse the skills of argumentation during their lessons.
Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Qualitative research design was conducted with 15 students in the study. The outcomes of this project have been disseminated in the science education community worldwide, and the use of tap is forming a significant component of teacher professional development aimed at enhancing the pedagogy of argumentation in science. The center is nationally and internationally recognized for the quality of its programs and. Evidencebased dialogue maps as a research tool to investigate the quality of school pupils scientific argumentation, international journal of research and method in education, 31, 3, pp. Rebuttal is an essential aspect in scientific argumentation skill. This study aimed to compare the argumentation skills between male and female students in science through the argumentdriven inquiry adi. The skill of asking good questions in mathematics teaching. The research reported in this paper focussed on the design of learning environments that support the teaching and learning of argumentation in a scientific context.
Perez ke, strauss ea, downey n, galbraith a, jeanne r, cooper s. Learning processes and mental structures that support quality. As one of the hallmarks of the scientist is critical. This article describes the effect of a teachinglearning sequence tls based on the discovery of oxygen in promoting students argumentation.
Are we ready for argumentation in science classrooms. Greene, elizabeth allen, sara baszczewski, amanda swearingen, liwei wei and ana m. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. The effects of argumentation activities on seventh grade. The data used in this analysis was derived from students. Those interested in mathematics education have recognized the value of asking good questions for centuries. Erduran, s 2019 argumentation in chemistry education. To increase the quality of scientific discussion in science class rooms, first of. Supporting grade 58 students in constructing explanations in science. International journal of science education, 382, 170191.
Erduran, s, dagher, z 2014 reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. The mission of the smithsonian science education center is to improve k12 teaching and learning of science for all students in the united states and throughout the world. Middle school students need to be empowered in their argumentation skills to answer challenges to global competition. The center is nationally and internationally recognized for the quality of its programs and its impact on k12 science education. The specific research reported here took place over two years between 1999 and 2001 in junior high schools in the greater london area. The research reported in this paper stemmed from our conviction that argument is a central dimension of both science and science education. Mcneill k l and krajcik j s 2012 supporting grade 58 students in constructing explanations in sciencethe claim, evidence, and reasoning framework for talk and writing boston, ma.
This paper by thomas russell, toward understanding tbe use of. A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for. Enhancing evidencebased argumentation in a mainland china. Using argumentation learning progressions to support.
As the first decade of the 21st century comes to a close, we are faced with enormous. Enhancing the quality of argument in school science article pdf available in journal of research in science teaching 4110. Primary studentsa argumentation on factors affecting. The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing. Enhancing and evaluating scientific argumentation in the. Fostering students knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Students responses toward scientific argumentation with.
Argumentation seems to play a central role in science education. The sample included 100 indonesian senior high school students 47% male and 53% female who were studying at public school in east java province. Previous research on argument over the past few decades certain influential educational projects have all laid foundations for the work on argumentation in science lessons. Journal of research in science teaching, 4110, 9941020. Learning processes and mental structures that support. Earlier work on enhancing the quality of argument in school science had focused on ways in which such quality could be determined. The sample consisted of a total of 90 eighth graders consisting of two different schools in the junior high school. With respect to students deficits in scientific argumentation, some studies focused on the structural quality of studentgenerated arguments, for example on the use of evidence e. Recent approaches in educational research frame science learning in terms of the appropriation of. Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Professional learning for argumentation in school science.
Followup qualitative analyses of interview responses suggest that all three groups tend to focus on similar, sociomoral themes as they negotiate socially complex, genetic engineering issues, but that the science majors frequently reference specific science content. Enhancing the quality of argument in school science citeseerx. Developments in the application of toulmins argument pattern for studying science discourse. The role of argumentation in developing scientific literacy. Argumentdriven inquiry, gender, and its effects on.
Professional learning portfolios for argumentation in school science. Using a modified argumentdriven inquiry to promote elementary school studentsa engagement in learning science and argumentation. Using history and philosophy of science to promote. Argumentation does not differ among nonscience majors or high school students. Modelling and argumentation with elementary school. Developments in the application of toulmins argument pattern for studying science discourse s erduran, s simon, j osborne science education 88 6, 915933, 2004. Pdf enhancing the quality of argumentation in school. An argumentation based teachinglearning strategy was used to enhance quality in students arguments in science lessons. The effects of argumentation model on students achievement. The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation. Wesley pitts this research presented in chapters 2, 3, and 4 in this dissertation uses a sociocultural and sociohistorical lens, particularly around power, authority of knowledge and identity formation, to. The effect of thought experimentsbased argumentation on. Students who can produce a high quality rebuttal to defend their claims are proved higher level of scientific argumentation skill than the student who can only produce claims, evidence and reasoning.
Pdf enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Thus, the aim of this research was to shed light in this direction. Dec 01, 2004 enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science osborne, jonathan. Using history and philosophy of science to promote students. Butler, fostering high school students conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through quality talk discussions, science education, 102, 6, 12391264, 2018.
767 948 672 362 1420 422 1633 281 80 1136 822 1465 618 905 288 922 103 1487 1193 861 685 294 454 824 1360 1548 1509 669 1240 1248 642 806 583 196 191 271 1129 136 940 618